Senators Strickland, Emmerson and Walters are strongly leaning to vote “yes” for NPV now, when just three years ago, they all three voted “no” for NPV, SB 37. It would be better for Republicans and Conservatives to have a split of Electoral College votes by Congressional Districts, than to have NPV. Why are our leaders not pushing again and again and again for Electoral College Split by Congressional Districts? Why just cave and then vote with the progressive liberal Democrat establishment that really wants NPV?
The NPV is not a very good idea for Conservatives or Republicans because as Assemblyman Jefferies who was a Co-Sponsor of AB 459 and voted NO put it,
>Failure in California to require voter
> identification at polling locations has been a growing problem. With
> the NPV in place for California and the nation – the integrity of our
> voting system could be put at further risk as unethical organizations
> carry out local, regional, statewide and national efforts to manipulate
> and undermine our wide-open / no-questions-asked polling locations.
Why are these three Senators standing with the progressive liberal lefties who are responsible for the voter fraud that is happening right now in California? We have all heard the stories of fraud from San Diego and Acorn. The thought of yet more fraud from the Unions and the progressive left here in California with the passing of AB 459 to win the presidency is making me want to PUKE. Conservatives and Republicans don’t cheat at the Ballot Box, so then why make it easier for the Left?
The Senators need to listen to Assemblyman Nestande, Co-Author of this bill, who had the courage to abstain from the vote, Co-Sponsor Assemblyman Kevin Jeffries who voted NO on AB 459 after being contacted by you, Shawn Steele, our RNC Committeeman, and with the Chairman of the California Republican Party, Tom Del Beccaro, the California Federation of Republican Women, the California Republican Assembly, John Fleishman of the Flash Report, and Elise Richmond of the Elise Richmond Show, Conservatively Speaking, and many, many more that AB 459 will devastate our State and the United States of America.
With what all of us have said, why would Senators Strickland, Emmerson, and Walters want to vote ‘yes’? I sincerely hope that these Senators will listen to your calls and emails and vote NO on AB 459. Why else did we elect them but listen and vote how we want them to!
It would be better for Republicans and Conservatives to have a split of Electoral College votes by Congressional Districts, than to have NPV. Why are our leaders not pushing again and again and again for Electoral College Split by Congressional Districts? Ask them to stand for the Electoral College to be split by Congressional Districts to get away from “Winner take all” or NPV…
Please take action NOW!!! Because of our past actions, Co- sponsors Assemblyman Nestande abstained from voting and Assemblyman Jefferies voted NO for AB 459.
Here are their numbers and their email addresses of the Co-sponsors of AB 459 in the Senate:
Let them hear our voices loud and clear and thank you for making a difference!Senator Tony Strickland Sacramento, (916) 651-4019 Simi Valley, (805) 306-8886
Senator Mimi Walters Sacramento, (916) 651-4033 Laguna Hills, (949) 457-7333 Fax: (949) 457-7305 Senator.Walters@senate.ca.gov
Senator Bill Emmerson Sacramento, (916) 651-4037 Palm Desert, CA 92660; (760) 568-0408 Riverside, CA 92507; (951) 680-6750 Fax: (760) 568-1501 Senator.Emmerson@senate.ca.gov
To give you some facts about LA County
2,286,987 demos in LA County 2010 1,049,383 Republicans in LA County 2010
1,455,184 64% votes for Moonbeam 749,439 71% votes for Meg
The Republicans turned out votes for Meg compared to Registration better than the demos turned out votes for Moonbeam and did Meg win LA County?
2,226,641 demos in LA County 2008 1,034,213 Republicans in LA County 2008
2,295,853 votes for Obama 956,425 votes for McCain
Do you think Republicans have a chance of winning in LA County or in California with all the fraud?
Thank you so much for all that you do and all together we do make a difference.
Past Chairman of the Riverside County Republican Party
America’s Stupidest Family:
Write and ask your representative to repeal certain provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and revive the separation between commercial banking and the securities business, in the manner provided in the Banking Act of 1933, the so-called ‘Glass-Steagall Act’
Glass-Steagall has been introduced to the House. Now we need co-sponsors. Please contact your Representative, there is a link to all members of Congress at www.politics1.com. Look up your elected representatives: www.house.gov/writerep
The text, http://thomas.loc.gov click “Bill Number” enter “H.R.1489”
TAKE ACTION! CALL THE STATE CONTROLLER’S office and tell them to AUDIT the Palm Springs Redevelopment Agency! State Controller’s office: 916-445-2636
AND CALL EACH INDIVIDUAL Palm Springs City Council member and TELL THEM to VOTE NO on 5E and 5F!!! We don’t want to see anyone with their pants on fire! (Liar Liar!)
Sending Care Packages to U. S. Troops
Your financial donation will help pay the shipping expenses
required to send each care package.
Take Michael Zak’s “Know your Republican Heritage” quiz #1!
“Republicans would benefit tremendously from appreciating the heritage of our Grand Old Party, born in 1854 to oppose the Democratic Party’s pro-slavery policies.” MZak
Read Michael Zak’s book “Back to Basics for the Republican Party”
Available at Amazon.com
The acclaimed history of the GOP from the Republican point of view. Clarence Thomas cited the book in a Supreme Court decision. “Back to Basics for the Republican Party is a handbook for Republicans who know what they feel in their heart to be missing from the party today. We need to return to our roots, and Michael Zak will show us the way.”
NRA / ILA Firearms Laws for CALIFORNIA
HERE IS A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF REQUIREMENTS FOR GUN OWNERSHIP IN CALIFORNIA. FOR COMPLETE INFORMATION, VISIT THE NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION SITE AT: WWW.NRAILA.ORG and specific California gun ownership information.
All firearms sales, transfers or loans, including private transactions and sales at gun shows, must go through a California licensed firearms dealer.
An application for sale or transfer must be made with a licensed California gun dealer before any firearm may be sold or transferred. This application contains a description of the buyer or transferee and of the firearm.
The purchaser must present the dealer with a valid California Driver’s License or a California Identification Card and supply their right thumbprint. The purchaser of a handgun must also provide additional proof of California residence, other than a document from the Department of Motor Vehicles.
The dealer sends a copy of the application to the California Department of Justice and the local police chief or sheriff.
The CA DOJ will conduct a background check on each buyer and the fee is $25.00. There is a 10-day waiting period before delivery of any firearm. Dealers must keep a register of all firearm transfers. If a person has voluntarily been screened through the Personal Firearms Eligibility Check, and has been found eligible to purchase and possess firearms, that person must still undergo a background check and a 10-day waiting period when purchasing a handgun.
Residents moving into California have 60 days to register their handguns.
CITIZENS for CALIFORNIA REFORM
JOIN CCR in the Citizen Legislature Project and help the People of California bring
accountability to Sacramento by returning our State to a part time Legislature.
Chris Burgard, ‘BORDER, the Divide between the American Dream and the American Nightmare’ – http://www.bordermovie.com/